0 of 2 1 of 2 1 of 1 0 of 3, -39 pts vs league from these spots 1 of 1 1 of 3, -35 pts vs league from these spots 0 of 2 1 of 1 1 of 2 1 of 3, -5 pts vs league from these spots 0 of 2 0 of 1 0 of 2 1 of 4, -13 pts vs league from these spots 2 of 5, -12 pts vs league from these spots 1 of 2 3 of 5, +8 pts vs league from these spots 1 of 1 1 of 2 1 of 1 0 of 1 0 of 2 1 of 3, -3 pts vs league from these spots 1 of 2 1 of 2 0 of 1 1 of 1 0 of 2 2 of 2 3 of 4, +38 pts vs league from these spots 1 of 1 2 of 2 0 of 1 0 of 1 1 of 1 0 of 1 0 of 1 2 of 3, -9 pts vs league from these spots 0 of 1 1 of 1 0 of 1 1 of 2 0 of 1 1 of 2 0 of 1 0 of 1 1 of 3, -9 pts vs league from these spots 0 of 1 0 of 1 0 of 1 0 of 1 1 of 1 1 of 1 Switch to Dots and tap any shot.
Bigger = more shots. Color vs league average from the same distance:
Shots updated Sat, Sep 26. 2 end-of-quarter heaves not counted, same as the box score. Regular season only. Shot locations come from ESPN play-by-play. How zones work
Who shoots like Liam McNeeley? See his shot twins
Shot profile Shot diet At the rim 17% lg 30% Paint 20% lg 19% Midrange 0% lg 10% Corner 3 24% lg 11% Above-the-break 3 39% lg 31% Bar = share of his shots.
Best zone Above-the-break 3 43% vs 35% league (+8)
Worst zone Corner 3 35% vs 39% league (-4)
How to read this view Shots grouped into small cells. Bigger cells mean more shots; the color is his FG% vs the league from the same distance. Glossary
Shot quality Shot selection -0.02 expected points per shot vs league
How good his shots are before anyone shoots: the points an average shooter would score from the same spots and shot types.
Shot making -1.5 points per 100 shots below expected
How much better or worse he finishes those shots than an average shooter would.
2025-26 regular season, 95 shots: 1.05 points per shot vs 1.07 expected. Under 200 shots, so no rank yet. Whole season, filters not applied.
Shots in view (95): 1.05 points per shot vs 1.07 expected (-1.4 per 100).
Shot quality leaders and how it works
